Tuesday, August 30, 2005

Can’t See the Trees For the

forestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestf
orestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestfo
restforestforestforestreeforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforest
forestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestf
orestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestfo
restforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestreeforestforestforest
forestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestf
orestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestforestfo
at

6 comments:

  1. C. DaleAugust 30, 2005 1:16 PM

    How cryptic!

    ReplyDelete
  2. PeterAugust 30, 2005 9:59 PM

    lol . . . if you look closely, you can fins lots of "trees" here.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Abe LouiseAugust 31, 2005 12:08 AM

    indeed. i like your blog. it's quite queer. and also very green, the strangest light lime pee green, like the frond of a
    fiddlehead fern.

    ReplyDelete
  4. A. D.August 31, 2005 8:16 AM

    i found two trees. what do i win?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Pamela Johnson ParkerAugust 31, 2005 9:01 AM

    Raleigh (my eight-year-old) wants to know if that's how you spell forestree. She found two forestrees. I only see one, but I am sure she is correct. Soon she'll beat me at Scrabble, also.

    ReplyDelete
  6. PeterAugust 31, 2005 4:24 PM

    There are actually many more than two "trees" -- can you find them?

    Hint: look vertically/diagonally.

    ReplyDelete